Tabiat Kariasali: The Affiliative Leadership of the Informal Taumaas of the Suluk Communities on the East Coast of Sabah
PDF

Keywords

Suluk
instinctual role
informal taumaas
Suluk communities
Sabah

How to Cite

Danial, N., Amat, A., Dino, N., & Abdurahman, N. (2024). Tabiat Kariasali: The Affiliative Leadership of the Informal Taumaas of the Suluk Communities on the East Coast of Sabah. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 29(2), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v29i2.304

Abstract

The taumaas (headman), as the nakura’ (leader) and a sara’ (lawgiver) of the adat (customs) appointed by the udduk hula’ (permanent resident), is the informal leader following the customs and traditions to exercise traditional authority over the Suluk communities. This study explores the tabiat kariasali (instinctual role) of the informal taumaas leadership in the Sabah East Coast Suluk communities, which uses a unique form of community leadership that addresses different community needs, including emotional well-being, spiritual harmony, social vices, educational needs, and healthcare. Through interviews with the nine taumaas in Semporna, Lahad Datu, and Sandakan in Sabah, the study reveals the strengths of the taumaas system. Thematic analysis of the responses highlights these leadership strengths, promoting social harmony through traditional mediation methods and integrating nasihat (religion) and governance to address emotional and spiritual needs while utilizing flexible collaboration and transformative justice approaches to combat social vices. Additionally, the creativity of the taumaas system is demonstrated through community-based literacy programs and the integration of traditional healing and healthcare practices in the Suluk community. However, the study also finds that the challenges they face, particularly in securing funds to sustain essential programs and the responsibilities of the taumaas, encompassing conflict resolution, education, and healthcare, create tension given limited financial resources. The official acknowledgment and support from the authorities would significantly enhance the informal leader’s endeavors to uphold peace and order and advance human development and cultural preservation. It is hoped that this study could explore potential solutions to resource constraints and investigate how the system can adapt when challenges arise in the Suluk community.

https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v29i2.304
PDF

References

Bara, H. (2009). Tausug of Sulu. National Commission for Culture and the Arts.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.

Bruno, J. (1973). The social world of the Tausug. Centro Escolar University.

Danial, N., Amat, A., & Dino, N. (2024). Whispers of wisdom: Exploring the essence of partandaan in the Suluk indigenous mediation. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 29(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v29i1.299

Dino, N., Guinto-Sali, M. J. Z., Matolo, A. L.,Amat, A. & Ingilan, S. S. (2023). Uncovering the unsung hero of Sulu: Panglima Sayyadi’s character archetypes in kissa. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 28(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v28i1.248

Fisher, R. J. (1995). Pacific impartial third-party intervention in international conflict: A review and an analysis (Eds.), In J. A. Vasquez, J. T. Jhonson, F. Sanford, & L. Stamato (Eds.), Beyond Confrontation: Learning Conflict Resolution in Post-Cold War Era. University of Michigan Press.

Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & Mckee, A. (2009). Primal leadership. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 37, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2009.5235507

Hadiati, M., Syailendra, M. R., & Marfungah, L. (2020). Mediation as an alternative to underage marriage dispute resolution. In Proceedings of the Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution International Conference (ADRIC 2019). Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200917.001

Haji Omar, A. (1983). The Malay people of Malaysia and their languages. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Hassan, I. U., Ashley, S. A., & Ashley, M. L. (1994). Tausug-English dictionary: Kabtangan Iban maana. Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Hassim, S. (2013, March 7). Kumpulan Suluk berhimpun bantah pencerobohan. Bernama. https://tinyurl.com/2cbyt5tt

Hedjazi, A. K., & Hedjazi, S. U. (2002). The rise and fall of the Sulu Islamic Empire (1675-1919). Professional Press.

Hidaya, Z. (2015). Ensiklopedia suku bangsa di Indonesia. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Ingilan, S. (2018a). Tausug’s identity in parang sabil: A critical discourse analysis. CMU Journal of Science, 22(1), 37–43. https://tinyurl.com/3835ajym

Ingilan, S. (2018b). Exploring the directives and politeness in Tausug parang sabil. International Journal of Education Research for Higher Learning, 24(1), 71–88. https://tinyurl.com/4nbavs58

Ingilan, S. (2020). Language choice online: Identity of overseas Tausug workers. International Journal of Education Research for Higher Learning, 26(1), 41–62. https://tinyurl.com/4jdnpj37

Ingilan, S. S., & Abdurajak, N. C. (2021). Unveiling the Tausug culture in parang sabil through translation. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 26(2), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v26i2.156

Khan, H. A., & Hak, N. A. (2014). Community mediation in Malaysia: A step forward. Malayan Law Journal, 1, 1–16.

Kiefer, T. (1969). Tausug armed conflict: The social organization of the military activity in a Philippine Moslem Society. The University of Chicago.

Kiefer, T. (1972). The Tausug: Violence and law in a Philippines Moslem society. HOH Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.

Koentjaraningrat. (1977). Beberapa pokok antropologi sosial. Dian Rakyat.

Lestari, R. (2013). Perbandingan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Mediasi di Pengadilan dan di Luar Pengadilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 217–237. http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/jih.v3i2.1819

Majul, C. A. (1999). Muslim in the Philippines. The University of the Philippines Press.

Mohd Fuad, S. (2015). Konflik Keluarga Islam dan Kaedah Penyelesaian di Mahkamah Syariah di Selangor. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1836.3600

Quadan, A., & Dan, K. (2010). Community mediation: Theory and practice. The University of Sydney.

Rohman, M., Istianah, S. R. D., & Widayati, W. (2021). The role of leaders and community empowerment in Village Autonomy. Law Development Journal, 3(4), 743–748. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.4.743-748

Rosyati, A. (2009). Peranan pemimpin informal pada masyarakat Guradog. Patanjala, 1(2), 201–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.30959/patanjala.v1i2.249

Rasul, J. (2003). Struggle for identity: A short history of the Filipino Muslims. CARE Minorities, Inc. Saleeby, N. (1908). The history of Sulu. Bureau of Science Division of Ethnology.

Reginio, F. (2024). Manobo of Barangay Caburan Small and and Barangay Caburan Big, Jose Abad Santos, Davao Occidental. In L. Rayon (Ed.), The Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Practices in Disaster Risk Reduction and Management of the Selected Groups in the Davao Region. University of Southeastern Philippines. https://doi.org/10.53899/iksp.b2.006

Saleeby, N. (1908). The history of Sulu. Bureau of Science Division of Ethnology.

Savun, B. (2008). Information, bias, and mediation success. International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2007.00490.x

Straub, J. M. (1997). Mediation model of organizational leadership: A communication-based framework for effective leadership [Master's Thesis, The University of Montana]. ScholarWorks. https://tinyurl.com/528nd8ep

Stulberg, J. B. (1987). Taking charge: Managing conflict. Lexington Books.

Tan, S. (2010). The Muslim south and beyond. The University of the Philippines Press.

Wall, J. A., Stark, J. B., & Standifer, R. L. (2001). Mediation: A current review and theory development. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(3), 370–391.

Young, O. R. (1967). Intermediaries: Third parties in international crises. Princeton University Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.