Keywords
symbolism
mediation
taumaas
Sabah
How to Cite
Abstract
The Orang Suluk, who call themselves Tausug, have a deep history in the sea areas and are known for their strong cultural and political independence. Residing in the Sulu Archipelago and the northeastern coast of Borneo, they identify themselves by names such as Suluk, Anak Negeri, coastal people, sea people, indigenous maritime group, and Orang Asal Pesisir. Symbols are a part of the Suluk Indigenous Mediation (SIM) approach, which is still practiced on the east coast of Sabah, Malaysia. The techniques mentioned are organic to the Adat (customs) of the Suluk passed down from their forefathers. This study discusses the essence of partandaan (symbols) found in SIM practices of the Suluk mediators in the said geographical area. Five expert informants in Semporna, Lahad Datu, and Sandakan shared their wisdom, experience, and interpretation of the SIM during the in-depth interviews as empirical data. The researchers also did library work to collect secondary data. Employing Hewitt’s Symbolic Interactionism (2002), findings revealed that objects, social acts, and language carry symbols that are meaningful to the life of the Suluk. They influence the thinking of the Tausug, maintain the balance and harmony of their day-to-day life, and crystalize the vision of peace, understanding, and forgiveness. Indeed, symbols are fruitful tools for successful culturally and religiously sensitive mediation. The study highlights the significance of symbols in Suluk Indigenous Mediation, suggesting further exploration of cultural variations and the potential integration of symbolic elements into conflict resolution mechanisms.
References
Absari, D. (2021). PagTuhan: The Tausug spiritual tradition. The University of the Philippines Press.
Al-Krenawi, A. (2016). The role of the mosque and its relevance to social work. International Social Work, 59(3), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815626997
Ali, Y. (1991). The Holy Quran english translation of the meanings and commentary. King Fahd Printing Complex.
Bara, H. (2009). Tausug of Sulu. The National Commission for Culture and the Arts.
Bentley, G. C. (1992). “Order and law in Muslim Mindanao”. In M. Turner, R. J. May, & L. R. Turner (Eds.), Mindanao: Land of Unfulfilled Promise (pp. 97-108). New Day Publisher.
Bruno, J. (1973). The social world of the Tausug. Centro Escolar University.
Dino, N. S., Arus, B., Samad, L.A., & Ampang, J. (2021). Suluk ukkil on the Barung: Expressions, motifs and meanings. Universiti Malaysia Sabah Press.
Dino, N. S., Guinto-Sali, M. J., Matolo, A. H. L., Amat, A., & Ingilan, S. (2023). Uncovering the unsung hero of Sulu: Panglima Sayyadi’s character archetypes in kissa. Southeastern Philippines
Journal of Research and Development, 28(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v28i1.248
Durante, O., Gomez, Norma R., Sevilla, E., & Manego, H. (2007). “Tausug and Corsican clan feuding: A comparative study,” in Rido: Clan feuding and conflict management in Mindanao. In W. M. Torres III (Ed.). The Asia Foundation.
Goldman, B. M. Cropanz, R., Stein., & Lehman III, B. (2008). The role of third parties/mediation in managing conflict in organizations. In C. K. W. De Dreu & M. J. Gelfand (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations (pp. 291–319). Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Haji Omar, A. (1983). The Malay people of Malaysia and their languages. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Hewitt, J. (2002). Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology (9th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Hidaya, Z. (2015). Ensiklopedia suku bangsa di Indonesia. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Ingilan, S. (2017). Unveiling the Muslimah: A feminist stylistic analysis of the image of the female Filipino Muslims in short stories. Jati Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 22(1), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.22452/jati.vol22no1.10
Ingilan, S. (2018). Tausug’s identity in Parang Sabil: A critical discourse analysis. CMU Journal of Science, 22(1), 37-43. https://js.cmu.edu.ph/CMUJS/article/view/34
Ingilan, S., & Abdurajak, N. (2021). Unveiling the Tausug culture in parang sabil through translation. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 26(2), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v26i2.156
Jubilado, R., Ingilan, S., & Dumanig, F. (2015). Expressing profanity in Cebuano and Bahasa Sug. Jati Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 20, 136-157. https://doi.org/10.22452/jati.vol20no1.9.
Issifu, K. & Assante Jr., J. (2016). Efficacy of the indigenous approach to peacebuilding in Africa. Peace Studies Journal, 9(1), 9-21. https://tinyurl.com/58abp5p3
Jumlail Jr., E. (2023). Exploring the experiences and effects of polygamous marriages on community women in Zamboanga City, Philippines. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4623256
Jundam, M. (2005). Tunggal Hula’-Duwa Sarah: Adat and Sharee’ah laws in the life of the Tausug. Vibal Publishing House Inc.
Kee Sabariah, K. M., & Asmiaty, A. (2012). Suluk. In K. Mariappan & P. Porodong (Eds.), Murut dan pelbagai etnik kecil lain di Sabah (Siri Etnik Sabah ITBM-UMS). Institut Terjemahan dan Buku Malaysia.
Kiefer, T. (1969). Tausug armed conflict: The social organization of the military activity in a Philippine Moslem Society. The University of Chicago.
Kiefer, T. (1972). The Tausug: Violence and law in a Philippines Moslem society. HOH Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
Majul, C.A. (1999). Muslim in the Philippines. The University of the Philippines Press.
Mayo, K. (1925) The isles of fear: The truth about the Philippines. Harcourt, Brace, and Company.
Moody, D. C. (1984). The Suluk (Tausug) language. In J. K. King & J. W. King (Eds.), Languages of Sabah: A survey report (Pacific Linguistics, Series C–No. 78, pp. 75-84). Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University.
Murithi, T. (2006). African approaches to building peace and social solidarity. International conference on strategies for peace with development in Africa. The role of education, training, and research. University for Peace and the African Union, Ethiopia. https://tinyurl.com/5n8f8xn9
Mutalib, H. (2008). Islam in Southeast Asia. Southeast Asia background series, 11. ISEAS Publication. Singapore.
Rasul, J. D. (2009). Islam and the Filipino Muslims. FedPhil.
Redmond, M. (2015, January 1). Symbolic interactionism. Iowa State University. https://tinyurl.com/7vtk5xts
Sarpiya, S. K. (2018). A semiotic approach to conflict transformation: Can signs and symbols help make peace? Digital Commons @ George Fox University. https://tinyurl.com/h8bnvuy6
Straub, J. M. (1997). Mediation model of organizational leadership: A communication-based framework for effective leadership. Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5451.
Tan, S. (2010). The Muslim south and beyond. The University of the Philippines.
United Nation. (2012, June 25). United Nations guidance for effective mediation. United Nation. https://tinyurl.com/mfrksstv
Virola-Gardiola, M. (2012). Taking peace into their own hands. Center for Humanitarian Dialogue.
Warren. J. (1981). The Sulu zone. 1768-1898: The Dynamic of External Trade, Slavery, and Ethnicity in the Transformation of a Southeast Asian Maritime State. Singapore University Press.
Winslade, J., & Monk, G. D. (2000). Narrative mediation: A new approach to conflict resolution. John Wiley & Sons.
Yusin, M. (1990). Islam di Sabah. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kuala Lumpur.
Zartman, I. W. (2000). Traditional cures for modern conflicts: African conflict ‘Medicine’. Lynne Rienner.