Keywords
reassurance
speech act theory
commissives
How to Cite
Abstract
The Qur’an functions as a profound source of reassurance, offering guidance that addresses both the hearts and minds of its readers. Through its eloquent and impactful discourse, it instils a sense of confidence and tranquility, providing direction for navigating life’s challenges. The speech act of reassurance within the Qur’an thus serves as a significant reminder of faith, resilience, and the enduring presence of divine support. The current study investigates how reassurance functions as a commissive speech act in the Quran, employing Searle’s Speech Act Theory (1969) as the analytical framework. While previous studies have explored directive speech acts in religious discourse, there remains a gap in understanding how reassurance is linguistically and pragmatically realized in the Quranic text. Focusing on seven selected verses, the study analyzes the types of speakers (Allah, angels, prophets, and believers), syntactic structures (declaratives, imperatives, and negative imperatives), and illocutionary forces involved in conveying reassurance to human recipients in moments of distress. Through qualitative, contextual, and linguistic analysis, the study identifies patterns in the deployment of reassurance and examines their alignment with Searle’s felicity conditions. Findings reveal that although reassurance is categorically commissive, it is expressed both directly through declarative statements and indirectly via imperative forms. The speaker-hearer relationship, situational context, and lexical choices are illustrated to play crucial roles in shaping the illocutionary force of reassurance. The study highlights the Quran’s sophisticated use of speech acts to provide divine and prophetic support, offering insights into the pragmatic dimensions of religious discourse.
References
Abdulzahra, M. A. (2025). Speech acts in medical communication: A study of doctor-patient interaction. Journal of Babylon Center for Humanities Studies, 15(2). https://tinyurl.com/5xjmt8bf
Abu-Rabia-Queder, S. (2006). Between tradition and modernization: Understanding the problem of female Bedouin dropouts. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690500378893
Al-Saggaf, M. A., Yasin, M. S. M., & Abdullah, I. H. (2013). Cognitive meanings in selected English translated texts of the noble Qur’an. QURANICA-International Journal of Quranic Research, 4(1), 1-18. https://tinyurl.com/42ju23px
Al-Asfahani, A. (2009). Al-Mufradat fi Gharib Al-Quran (Strange vocabulary in the Quran). Dar Almarifah.
Al-Tabari, M. (1999). Tafsir Al-Tabari (Al-Tabari interpretation). Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyah.
Ali, A. Y. (2003). The meaning of the Holy Quran: New edition with revised translation, commentary, and newly compiled comprehensive index (10th ed.). Amana Publications.
Aliyah, A. M., & Laila, M. (2019). Speech act analysis of commissive utterances found in English translation of Surah Ali Imran [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta].
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
Bowlby, J. (1988). Developmental psychiatry comes of age. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 145(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.145.1.1
Creswell, J. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications.
Fillmore, C. (1981). Pragmatics and the description of discourse. Radical Pragmatics, 143–166.
Hawamdeh, M. A., Al Aqqad, M. H., & Mahamdeh, A. A. (2025). Key topics and case studies in pragmatics: Examples of corpus-based research. Language, Technology, and Social Media, 3(2), 288-303. https://doi.org/10.70211/ltsm.v3i2.233
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Hussin, M., Alaqad, M., Rifa’in, S., & Rifain, M. (2025). Figures of speech in the Hadith of Prophet Muhammad: An analysis of tashbīh, isti’ārah, and kināyah. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 30(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v30i1.862
Ibn Kathir, I. (2000). Tafsir Ibn Kathir (Ibn Kathir Interpretation). Dar-us-Salam.
Istiqomah, R. A., & Ibrohim, B. (2020). Commissive speech act in the English translation of Holy Qur’an Surah Thaha by MAS Abdel Halem: A pragmatic study. Indonesian Journal of English Studies, 1(1), 19-29.
Kadhim, S. M., & Abbas, I. J. (2015). The speech act of threatening in English and Arabic with reference to the glorious Qur’an. Basic Education College Magazine for Educational and Humanities Sciences, 21.
Khazaleh, H. A. D., Sapar, A. A., & Mohd Jan, J. (2023). A pragmatic analysis of the speech act of supplication in the Holy Quran. Al-Dad Journal, 7(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.22452/aldad.vol7no1.3
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and Quantity, 38, 787-800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-8107-7
Lambert, G. (2013). The leaders are coming! West Bow Press.
Leech, G. N. (2016). Principles of pragmatics. Routledge.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
Maknun, T. (2017). Pragmatics analysis: Arabic directive imperative speech acts used in Alquran. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(1), 952–955. https://doi.org/10.21275/art20164093
McAfee, N. (2007). Speech acts and violence: Troubling ties between truth and power. Columbia University Press.
Mey, J. L. (1996). Introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Poole, S. (1999). An introduction to linguistics. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts1. Language in Society, 5(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837
Searle, J. R., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge University Press Archive.
Stemler, S. E. (2015). Content analysis. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0053
Supriyani, N., & Sabardila, A. (2022, May). Analysis of commissive speech acts in the translate text of the Qur’anic Surah of Maryam and its function in developing students’ prophetic characters. In International Conference of Learning on Advance Education (ICOLAE 2021) (pp. 180-188). Atlantis Press.
Tajabadi, F., & Pourmohammad, M. (2022). The usage of commissive speech act in the Qur’an. Journal of Interdisciplinary Qur’anic Studies, 1(2), 57-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.37264/jiqs.v1i2.4
Vendler, Z. (1972). Res cogitans: An essay in rational psychology. Cornell University Press.
Weber, R. P. (1984). Computer-aided content analysis: A short primer. Qualitative Sociology, 7(1), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987112
Widdowson, H. G. (2000). On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.1.3
Zou, L., & Yiye, Z. (2022). Review of research on development of speech act theory and its application. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5(12), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.12.16
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.