Abstract
Shelter programs stand out as powerful drivers of development, recognizing the rights of the urban beneficiaries in determining their well-being. This study emphasizes the Davao City Shelter Code as the nation’s pioneering local government-led shelter code initiative. The research utilizes a grounded theory approach, as it is well-suited for understanding complex, emerging phenomena within the shelter program and the challenges experienced by shelter beneficiaries. The study employed theoretical sampling and snowball sampling techniques to collect data while analyzing the challenges shelter beneficiaries face through an in-depth case study. For this purpose, 27 key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted alongside 34 focus group discussions (FGDs) at four different resettlement sites. The findings underscore challenges linked to loss of livelihood due to displacement, skills training mismatch, and insufficient leadership skills experienced by the shelter beneficiaries. Despite these challenges, these shelter beneficiaries have illustrated their capabilities to start income-generating exercises with assurance to outlive, regularly with bolster from NGOs and private companies. Moreover, the inquiry recognizes proposed activities for capacity-building to improve protection conditions and advance the well-being of the recipients by and large. Finally, the researchers developed a theory for the shelter program that outlines the steps that link challenges, capacity-building social resources, and autonomous well-being, ultimately leading to the creation of the ‘shelter-space theory’. This theory emphasizes sustainable networks and community development initiatives to improve living conditions, prevent dependency, and ensure active involvement among the shelter beneficiaries in Davao City, Philippines.
References
Adger, W., Barnett, J., Brown, K., Marshall, N., & O'Brien, K. (2013). Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 3(2), 112-117. https://tinyurl.com/3ufs4yb5
Alkire, S. (2016). The capability approach and well-being measurement for public policy. In M. D. Adler and M. Fleurbaey (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy (pp. 615-544). Oxford University Press.
Alkire, S. (2020). ‘Multidimensional poverty measures as a policy tool’. In V. Beck, H. Hahn, and R. Lepenies (Eds.), Dimensions of Poverty: Measurement, Epistemic Injustices, Activism (pp. 197-214). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31711-9_12
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2017). Multidimensional poverty measurement: A guide. World Bank Publications.
Alkire, S., & Ul Haq, R. (2023). Analyzing individual deprivations alongside household poverty: Possibilities for gendered, intrahousehold and multidimensional analyses. Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford.
Asian Development Bank. (2008). Technical assistance to the Republic of the Philippines: Preparing the Philippines for basic urban services sector project. Manila (TA 7062-PHI). https://tinyurl.com/4ywjhp5d
Asian Development Bank. (2012). Key indicators for Asia and the Pacific (43rd ed.). https://tinyurl.com/yp9hd59v
Bisht, T. (2014). Negotiating impoverishment risks through informal social structures and practices. In J. Perera (Ed.), Lose to Gain: Is Involuntary Resettlement a Development Opportunity? (pp. 15-35). https://tinyurl.com/pt7fpv6e
Chambers, R. (1992). Rural appraisal: Rapid, relaxed and participatory. Institute of Development Studies.
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). SAGE. https://tinyurl.com/4p4udrrc
City Planning and Development Office of Davao City. (2018). Comprehensive Development Plan 2018-2022, 2. https://tinyurl.com/ukzsw87f
Crehan, K. (1992). Rural households. In H. Bernstein, B. Crow, & H. Johnson (Eds.), Rural Livelihoods: Crises and Responses (pp. 87-113). Oxford University Press.
Granovetter, M. (2020). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 38(1), 20-48.
Greenhalgh, L., & Lewicki, R. (2015). Evolution of teaching negotiation: The legacy of Walton and McKersie. Negotiation Journal, 31(4), 465-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12130
Habaradas, R. & Aquino, M. (2010). Toward innovative, liveable, and prosperous Asian megacities Gawad Kalinga: Innovation in the city (and beyond). https://tinyurl.com/snrrbtm4
Keijzer, N., Spierings, E., Phlix, G., & Fowler, A. (2011, December 7). Bringing the invisible into perspective: Reference document for using the 5Cs framework to plan, monitor and evaluate capacity and results of capacity development processes. European Centre for Development Policy Management. https://tinyurl.com/2puket8m
Kelly, P., & Ortega, A. (2020). Diaspora and development beyond the State: The case of Gawad Kalinga in the Philippines. South East Asia Research, 28(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2020.1727297
Moore, M. H. (2018). Creating public value: Strategic management in government (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press.
Nikuze, A., Sliuzas, R., Flacke, R., & van Maarseveen, M. (2019). Livelihood impacts of displacement and resettlement on informal households—A case study from Kigali, Rwanda. Habitat Int., 86, 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.02.006
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Ocampo, T. (2015). Poverty alleviation through social innovation: The Gawad Kalinga Enchanted Farm Model- A case study research [Paper presentation]. 3rd National Business and Management Conference, St. Louis University-Maryheights Campus, Baguio City. https://tinyurl.com/ynttf42t
Palanivel, T. (2017, September 6). Rapid urbanisation: opportunities and challenges to improve the well-being of socities. United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Reports. https://tinyurl.com/2kc77vtw
Perera, J (Ed.) (2014). Lose to gain: Is involuntary resettlement a development opportunity? Asian Development Bank. https://tinyurl.com/pt7fpv6e
Philippine Statistics Authority-National Statistics Office. (2023). National Statistics Office. https://tinyurl.com/59784yer
Ravallion, M. (2011). On multidimensional indices of poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 9(2), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-011-9173-4
Ravallion, M. (2016). The economics of poverty: History, theory, and policy. Oxford University Press.
Robeyns, I. (2016). Capabilitarianism. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1145631
Robeyns, I. (2017). Wellbeing, freedom and social Justice: The capability approach re-examined. Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0130
Sapkota, B. D. (2021, January 31). Sustainable livelihoods approach: Alternative to rural development. Triyuga Academic Journal, 2(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.3126/taj.v2i1.45619
Sen, A. (1984). Rights and capabilities: Resources, values, and development. Blackwell, Oxford University.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Knopf.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2012, December 14). Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis. https://tinyurl.com/mprmtpwp
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2020, December 21). The next frontier: Human development and the anthropocene. https://tinyurl.com/5n7m8fcd
UN-Habitat (2018). SDG indicator 11.1.1 training module: Adequate housing and slum upgrading. United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-Habitat), Nairobi. https://tinyurl.com/4d455yh8
Urban Development and Housing Act of 1992 (Republic Act 7279). Housing and land use regulatory board, Philippines. https://tinyurl.com/yyn9z6jn
Watanabe, M. (2016, July). Closing the gap in affordable housing in the Philippines: Experience of the National Summit on Housing and Urban Development. Presidential Commission for the Urban Poor (PCUP) Newsletter. https://tinyurl.com/yr8p8tb6
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.