Preliminary Analysis of Cross-shareholding in the Green Supply Chain and Recommendations for Regulatory Policy in the Philippines
spjrd
PDF

Keywords

legal policy
cross-shareholding
supply chain
the Philippines

How to Cite

Phuoc Thong, T. N., & Thu Hang, D. T. (2023). Preliminary Analysis of Cross-shareholding in the Green Supply Chain and Recommendations for Regulatory Policy in the Philippines. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 28(2), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v28i2.252

Abstract

Cross-shareholding is increasingly used in supply chains to improve strategic synergy between companies. However, regulations on cross-ownership within green supply chains are still in their early stages of development. Cross-ownership affects both the government’s pricing strategy and its carbon reduction policies. Additionally, the cross-shareholding structure impacts the profitability of the supply chain by introducing power dynamics between manufacturers and retailers. When cross-shareholding regulations and models are implemented, manufacturers and retailers within the supply chain exhibit more substantial reductions in their carbon footprint and experience increased profits, particularly in decentralized supply chains when cross ownership surpasses a specific threshold. The adoption of cross-shareholding profit-sharing agreements could enhance the performance of green supply chains. This article synthesizes the views of scholars on cross shareholding in the supply chain. It uses analytical methods to evaluate the role of the negotiation process, trade credit, and cross-shareholding in the supply chain. The article uses jurisprudence to recommend a cross shareholding policy in the Philippines to enhance supply chain efficiency. It uses the “Stackelberg Leadership Model” to analyze the impact of cross-shareholding on two levels of the supply chain, offering recommendations for future implementation to improve supply chain efficiency. The article recommends that the Philippines’ supply chain policy include mechanisms to encourage new companies to join the existing cross-ownership network, capitalize on the impact of cross-shareholding on supply chain assessment, and develop ways to use equity ratio and trade credit. These recommendations aim to refine policy and legislation in the Philippines to effectively utilize trade credit, equity ratios, and cross-shareholdings in supply chain management.

https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v28i2.252
PDF

References

Agi, M.A.N., Yan, X. (2020). Greening products in a supply chain under market segmentation and different channel power structures. Int. J. Prod. Econ, 223.

Alley, W. (1997). Partial ownership arrangements and collusion in the automobile industry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 45(2): 191-205.

Amundsen, E., & Bergman, L. (2002). Will cross-ownership reestablish market power in the Nordic power market? The Energy Journal, 23(2): 73-95.

Barbosa-Po´voa, A.P., da Silva, C., Carvalho, A., 2018. Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: an operations research perspective. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 268: 399–431.

Becker-Peth, M., Thonemann, U.W. (2016). Reference points in revenue sharing contracts - how to design optimal supply chain contracts. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 249: 1033–1049.

Birge, John R., and Xiaodong Xu. (2004). Joint Production and Financing Decisions: Modeling and Analysis.

Brioschi, Francesco, Luigi Buzzacchi, and Massimo G. Colombo. (1989). Risk Capital Financing and the Separation of Ownership and Control in Business Groups. Journal of Banking & Finance, 13(4): 747–772.

Brooks, C., Chen, Z., Zeng, Y. (2018). Institutional cross-ownership and corporate strategy: The case of mergers and acquisitions. J. Corp. Finance, 48: 187–216.

Buzacott, John A., and Rachel Q. Zhang. (2004). Inventory Management with Asset-Based Financing. Management Science, 50(9): 1274–1292.

Cachon, G.P. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. In A. G. de Kok & S. C. Graves (Eds.). Handbooks in OR& MS. Netherland: Elsevier.

Cachon, G. P. (2004). The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain: Push, pull, and advance-purchase discount contracts. Management Sci., 50(2): 222-238.

Chen, C.K., & Ulya, M.A. (2019). Analyses of the reward-penalty mechanism in green closed-loop supply chains with product remanufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 210, 211–223.

Chen, J., Hu, Q., & Song, J. (2017). Effect of partial cross ownership on supply chain performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 258(2), 525–536.

Cohen, L., & Frazzini, A. (2008). Economic links and predictable returns. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1977–2011.

Drake, D.F., Kleindorfer, P.R., Van Wassenhove, L.N. (2016). Technology choice and capacity portfolios under emissions regulation. Prod. Oper. Manag., 25: 1006–1025.

Fedenia, M., Hodder, J., & Triantis, A. (1994). Cross-holdings: Estimation issues, biases, and distortions. The Review of Financial Studies, 7(1), 61–96.

Florackis, C., Kanas, A., & Kostakis, A. (2015). Dividend policy, managerial ownership, and debt financing: A non-parametric perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(3), 783–795.

Fu, H., & Ma, Y. (2019). Optimization and coordination of decentralized supply chains with vertical cross-shareholding. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 132, 23–35.

Fu, H, Ma, Y., & Cai, X. (2018). Downstream firm’s investment with equity holding in decentralized assembly systems. Omega, 75, 27–56.

Gaigné, C., Latouche, K., & Turolla, S. (2018). Vertical ownership and export performance: Firm-level evidence from the food industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 100(1), 46–72.

Gao, K., Shen, H., Gao, X., Chan, K.C. (2019). The power of sharing: evidence from institutional investor cross-ownership and corporate innovation. Int. Rev. Econ. Finance, 63, 284–296.

Güth, W., Nikiforakis, N., Normann, H.T. (2007). Vertical cross-shareholding: theory and experimental evidence. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 25, 69–89.

Hu, B., Feng, Y., 2017. Optimization and coordination of supply chain with revenue sharing contracts and service requirements under supply and demand uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 183, 185–193.

Jahani, H., Abbasi, B., & Talluri, S. (2019). Supply chain network redesign: A technical note on optimising financial performance. Decision Sciences, 50(6), 1319–1353.

Kornbluth, J., & Salkin, G. (1994). Mathematical programming models for ownership and control of European and American groups of companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 74(3), 479-494.

Kouvelis, P., & Zhao, W. (2012). Financing the newsvendor: Supplier vs. bank, and the structure of optimal trade credit contracts. Operations Research, 60(3), 566–580.

Kumar, R.L., & Park, S. (2019). A portfolio approach to supply chain risk management. Decision Sciences, 50(2), 210–244.

Lariviere, M. (1999). Supply chain contracting and coordination with stochastic demand. In S. Tayur, M. Magazine, R. Ganeshan (Eds.). Quantitative models for Supply Chain Management. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Lariviere, M., & Porteus, E. (2001). Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 3(4): 293-305.

Lenovo (2017). Lenovo announces breakthrough, innovative PC manufacturing process. https://tinyurl.com/3cmt9r6d

Levy, M. (2011). The Banzhaf index in complete and incomplete shareholding structures: A new algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 215(2), 411-421.

Savaskan, R.C., Van Wassenhove, L.N. (2006). Reverse channel design: The case of competing retailers. Manag. Sci., 52, 1–14.

Sheu, J.B. (2008). Green supply chain management, reverse logistics, and nuclear power generation. Transport. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 44, 19–46.

Swami, S., Shah, J. (2013). Channel coordination in green supply chain management. J. Oper. Res. Soc., 64: 336–351.

Thies, C., Kieckha¨fer, K., Spengler, T.S., Sodhi, M.S., (2019). Operations research for sustainability assessment of products: A review. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 274, 1–21.

Tian, F., Soˇsi´c, G., Debo, L., (2019). Manufacturers’ competition and cooperation in sustainability: Stable recycling alliances. Manag. Sci., 65, 4733–4753.

Vafa Arani, H., Rabbani, M., Rafiei, H., 2016. A revenue-sharing option contract toward coordination of supply chains. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 178, 42–56.

Walmart (2019). 2019 Environmental, social & governance report. https://tinyurl.com/bdh9z462

Womack, J., Daniel, J., & Daniel, R. (1991). The Machine that changed the world. New York: Harper Perennial, p.61.

Wu, D., Zhang, B., & Baron, O. (2019). A trade credit model with asymmetric competing retailers. Production and Operations Management, 28(1), 206–231.

Yang, D., Xiao, T., & Huang, J., (2019). Dual-channel structure choice of an environmental responsibility supply chain with green investment. J. Clean. Prod., 210, 134–145.

Yang, S.A., & Birge, J.R. (2013). How inventory is (should be) financed: Trade credit in supply chains with demand uncertainty and costs of financial distress. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1734682

Yang, S.A., & Birge, J.R. (2018). Trade credit, risk sharing, and inventory financing portfolios. Management Science, 64(8), 3667–3689.

Yang, S.A., Birge, J.R., & Parker, R.. (2015). The supply chain effects of bankruptcy. Management Science, 61(10), 2320–2338.

Yildiz, H., Yoon, J., Talluri, S., & Ho, W. (2016). Reliable supply chain network design. Decision Sciences, 47(4), 661–698.

Zhiyong, L. (2005). Stackelberg Leadership with demand uncertainty. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26(5), 345-350.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.