Politeness Strategies of Manobo Students in a Classroom in Kidapawan City, Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v28i2.247Keywords:
pragmatics, politeness strategies, Manobo, Kidapawan City, the PhilippinesAbstract
Awareness of the students in the pragmatics attached to language is crucial to communication success within classroom settings. Therefore, students might devise strategies to mitigate threats that can affect interlocutors’ engagement in communication. However, cultural and social factors can also influence how people communicate; hence, students from different backgrounds have nuances in the language used. This study is aimed at determining the politeness strategies utilized by Manobo students in their interaction in a classroom in a public school in Kidapawan City, Philippines. Using Brown and Levinson’s (1987) politeness strategy framework, the findings reveal that the politeness strategies used by Manobo students in the classroom with their Manobo and non-Manobo teachers were positive politeness, negative politeness, bald on-record, and off record. On the other hand, the politeness strategies among Manobo students were positive politeness, negative politeness, and bald-on record. Hence, the Manobo students have different politeness strategies depending on their relationship with the interlocutors in the classroom interaction. Politeness is relevant and essential in education, such as classroom teaching and learning practice. With a deeper understanding of its role in the academe, there could be more significant ways of improving the learning atmosphere.
Downloads
References
Abel, S. M. R., Davoudi, M., & Ramezanzadeh, A. (2016). A qualitative study of politeness strategies used by Iranian EFL learners in a class blog. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2016.20377.
Araneta, J. & Ingilan, S. (2019). Exploring the pragmatic functions of Cebuano kuan in conversations. International Journal of Education Research for Higher Learning 25(2), 63-84.
Araneta, J. & Ingilan, S. (2022). Pragmatic functions of formulaic expressions in Cebuano. Southeastern Philippines Journal of Research and Development, 27(2), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.53899/spjrd.v27i2.202
Blum-Kulka, S. (1992). 10. The metapragmatics of politeness in Israeli society. Politeness in Language, 255-280. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886542.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies. Norwood. NJ Alblex Publishing Corporation
Bremner, S. (2012). Politeness and face research. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0917
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning, 41-57.
Codreanu, A., & Debu, A. (2011). Politeness in requests: Some research findings relevant for intercultural encounters. Journal of Defense Resources Management, 2(2), 127-136.
Fernandez-Dalona, I. M., Palang, L., & Dalona, A. (2021). Cross-cultural pragmatic competence and its implications for educational practice. Toshkent Davlat Yuridik Universiteting Ixtisoslashtirilgan Filiali, 23-26.
Fraser, B. (1983). The domain of pragmatics Dalam language and communication, Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt.
Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008.
Hagge, J., & Kostelnick, C. (1989). Linguistic politeness in professional prose: A discourse analysis of auditors' suggestion letters, with implications for business communication pedagogy. Written Communication, 6(3), 312-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088389006003004
Ingilan, S. (2018). Exploring the directives and politeness in Tausug Parang Sabil. International Journal of Education Research for Higher Learning, 24(1), 71-88.
Jumanto, J. (2008). Komunikasi Fatis di Kalangan Penutur Jati Bahasa Inggris. Semarang: World Pro, 23.
Kasper, G. (1997). Second language teaching & curriculum center. University of Hawaii.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Routledge. London: Longman.
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness (No. 17). Cambridge University Press.
National Commission for Culture and the Arts. (n.d) Peoples of the Philippines. Manobo. https://tinyurl.com/ys9xxwny
Sealza, I. & Sealza L. (2000). Child labor among indigenous peoples: The case of a Manobo tribe in Bukidnon Province.
Umayah, S., Putra, I. N. A. J., & Suprianti, G. A. P. (2017). Politeness strategies in teacher-students classroom interaction at the eleventh grade students of SMK PGRI 1 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 5(2).
Valentine, T. M. (1994). When “no” means “yes”: Agreeing and disagreeing in Indian English discourse. International Conference on World Englishes Today.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
